Re: [PATCH 20/38] netns ct: NOTRACK in netns

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Friday 2008-09-05 08:25, Patrick McHardy wrote:
I hope so :) A different possiblity suggest by Pablo some time ago
would be to mark untracked packets in skb->nfctinfo and not
attach a conntrack at all.
Indeed, I remember that :). I left that patch of the table time ago [1].
There's a nf_reset call missing as Patrick said at that time. I can
recover it if you like the idea.
I think that would be a good idea.

Would that work? Right now, a ct==NULL indicates the 'INVALID' state,
and overloading it with 'UNTRACKED' does not seem nice.

ct == NULL would indicate either untracked or invalid.
For the cases where it makes a difference, ctinfo has
to be checked additionally.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux