Re: [PATCH 20/38] netns ct: NOTRACK in netns

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Make untracked conntrack per-netns. Compare conntracks with relevant
untracked one.

The following code you'll start laughing at this code:

	if (ct == ct->ct_net->ct.untracked)
		...

let me remind you that ->ct_net is set in only one place, and never
overwritten later.

All of this requires some surgery with headers, otherwise horrible circular
dependencies. And we lost nf_ct_is_untracked() as function, it became macro.

I think you could avoid this mess by using a struct nf_conntrack
for the untracked conntrack instead of struct nf_conn. It shouldn't
make any difference since its ignored anyways.


 struct netns_ct {
 	atomic_t		count;
@@ -12,5 +13,7 @@ struct netns_ct {
 	struct hlist_head	*expect_hash;
 	int			expect_vmalloc;
 	struct hlist_head	unconfirmed;
+	/* Fake conntrack entry for untracked connections */
+	struct nf_conn		untracked;
 };
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux