Re: [PATCH 20/38] netns ct: NOTRACK in netns

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 2008-09-04 22:58, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:

>In conntrack_mt_v0() "ct->status" can be used even for untracked connection,
>is this right?

Yes.

>For example, does setting IPS_NAT_DONE_MASK and IPS_CONFIRMED_BIT on
>untracked conntracked really necessary?

Does it even happen? Something smells afoul if ct->status is anything
but zero/unset for the untracked entry.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux