On Saturday 2008-08-16 19:48, Changli Gao wrote: >> >>> > But as the ECN options has not been documented so far, I think it'd be >>> > better to rename them at the same time to something like >>> > >>> > --ecn-tcp-cwr-remove >>> > --ecn-tcp-ece-remove >>> > --ecn-ip-ect-set >>> > >>> > and clashing with the ecn options were resolved. >>> >>> It sounds a good idae. But in order to avoid clashing, we'd better >>> change all the options for all matches in this way: >>> >>> match: foo >>> match-options: --foo-bar >> >> I think changing the existing clashing option names (with keeping the old >> ones for backward compatibility) is just enough - we can use the "rule" >> above for future new matches. > >Well, If so, we'd better make this rule well documented to let more >people know the issue we talked here if they don't obey it. I would not make this a hard requirement. (NAKing the NAK.) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
