On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 2:21 AM, Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, 16 Aug 2008, Changli Gao wrote: > >> > But as the ECN options has not been documented so far, I think it'd be >> > better to rename them at the same time to something like >> > >> > --ecn-tcp-cwr-remove >> > --ecn-tcp-ece-remove >> > --ecn-ip-ect-set >> > >> > and clashing with the ecn options were resolved. >> >> It sounds a good idae. But in order to avoid clashing, we'd better >> change all the options for all matches in this way: >> >> match: foo >> match-options: --foo-bar > > I think changing the existing clashing option names (with keeping the old > ones for backward compatibility) is just enough - we can use the "rule" > above for future new matches. > Well, If so, we'd better make this rule well documented to let more people know the issue we talked here if they don't obey it. -- Regards， Changli Gao(xiaosuo@xxxxxxxxx) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
