Hi Hugo, Hugo Mildenberger wrote: > Pablo, > > is the ulogd2 project maintained anymore? Or is it a > dead project? I have a big patch ready. It's alive, still under development. We plan to release a new beta soon. > *fix a number heap corruption issues in ulogd2 > > *provide a module invariant checking function which > warns e.g. about issues like possible heap corruption > by suspect module implementations > > *provide rewritten, state driven config file parser > based on flex capable of detecting wrongly spelled or > obsoleted parameters in config sections. > > *provide named stacks as an optional feature (which may > be used as a stem for generating output filenames, > while it is already used for more clear error messages) > > *add SIGUSR1 (reconfigure) support for all existing > modules > > *corrected some SIGUSR1 logfile reopen issues > > *introduce gcc printf-style argument checking on > ulogd_log function > > *include lineno and filename information in ulogd > messages Such a patchset would be great to have before releasing 2.0beta2 (we're on the way to do it). > I waited for the patches provided by eric Leblond in > netfilter-devel to be included in svn, but there are > none until today. So, what is the correct way to send a > patch upstream? Any plan to post it to the netfilter-devel ML? -- "Los honestos son inadaptados sociales" -- Les Luthiers -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
