Re: [PATCH 3/8] [NETFILTER]: rename NF_ARP to NFPROTO_ARP and assign a non-clashing value

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 2008-04-09 18:35, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
>> A few concerns.
>> If so, how would you deal with the addition of a new, real,
>> protocol? Suppose someone added support for the
>> semifictional IPv5, say  AF_INET5=42 or so. How would
>> this affect the NFPROTO list?
>
> It wouldn't since those values simply have seperate
> meanings. AF_INET5 might be 42, NFPROTO_INET5 could
> be .. lets say 5.
>
Then the big question is: what do you store in
ct->tuplehash[0].src.l3num, AF_INET5 or NFPROTO_IPV5?
Probably NFPROTO_IPV5.
Ok, then the only issue - if there is such - is when
AF_ values from the networking code pass into netfilter territory,
then you would need a translation function.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux