On Jan 8 2008 16:54, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> > >
>> > > +#ifdef __KERNEL__
>> > > + struct {
>> > > + union nf_inet_addr saddr;
>> > > + union nf_inet_addr smask;
>> > > + union nf_inet_addr daddr;
>> > > + union nf_inet_addr dmask;
>> > > + };
>> > > +#else
>> > > + struct {
>> > > + union xt_policy_addr saddr;
>> > > + union xt_policy_addr smask;
>> > > + union xt_policy_addr daddr;
>> > > + union xt_policy_addr dmask;
>> > > + };
>> > > +#endif
>> >
>> > I really dislike this uglyness, but I've applied it since
>> > there it also doesn't make much sense to leave single files
>> > using their own address definition.
>> >
>>
>> <CES>It will all go away in a few years time</CES>
>>
>> Ehrm, how will userspace actually deal with it?
>
>
> I don't understand what you mean with this question.
>
>
When will iptables start using the union nf_inet_addr saddr; variant?
I already figured it out myself, so don't bother. :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
