Re: [PATCH 19/27] xt_policy: use the new unoin nf_inet_addr

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Jan 8 2008 16:48, Patrick McHardy wrote:

+#ifdef __KERNEL__
+		struct {
+			union nf_inet_addr saddr;
+			union nf_inet_addr smask;
+			union nf_inet_addr daddr;
+			union nf_inet_addr dmask;
+		};
+#else
+		struct {
+			union xt_policy_addr saddr;
+			union xt_policy_addr smask;
+			union xt_policy_addr daddr;
+			union xt_policy_addr dmask;
+		};
+#endif

I really dislike this uglyness, but I've applied it since
there it also doesn't make much sense to leave single files
using their own address definition.


<CES>It will all go away in a few years time</CES>

Ehrm, how will userspace actually deal with it?


I don't understand what you mean with this question.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux