On Dec 14, 2007 6:22 AM, Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Salatiel Filho wrote: > > On 12/13/07, Laurence J. Lane <ljlane@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Dec 11, 2007 5:29 AM, Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >>> It shouldn't, but I haven't seen any other complaints about this > >>> yet, so please try to either compile the kernel natively or also > >>> cross-compile iptables. > >> [ I'm jumping in on the end of the thread with comments not directed > >> at anyone specific.] > >> > >> I just saw an additional comment to #446685. A search for "EABI iptables" > >> shows a known arm iptables' problem and at least one workaround is the chroot > >> method mentioned in the report. > >> > >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=446685 > > > The bad fd bug visible in the strace attached to that report is the > one I fixed in SVN. > > > I have not test the solution cause i have to download 116MB to chroot :) > > But i`m curious , if i compile both source kernel and source iptables > > , should`t they be compatible ? > > > They should, unless something is causing different structure layout. > I tried chroot in that rootfs. But when i try to run iptables i get # iptables -L ERROR: 0 not a valid target) Aborted So that is not a workaround. -- []'s Salatiel "O maior prazer do inteligente é bancar o idiota diante de um idiota que banca o inteligente". - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
