On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Stephen Stocker wrote: > On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Stephen Stocker wrote: > >> Um, apologies for the mess of a post above... I'm going to see which of >> the revisions broke things here. >> >> Take care, >> Steve > > OK, r31155 and 31156 are both fine, so it has to be 31157. Thanks again, > and apologies for the noise on the list. > > Take care, > Steve Just a note to let you know this error is now fixed, in r31336. Working like a charm again. Thanks. :) Take care, Steve
