Oliver Seitz wrote: >>> 1920x1080 is about 2 megapixels, that's not to much. But 50-60fps is a >>> number that definitely improves movement reception. >> Is there any proof of this an where can this proof be found, I'm very >> interested. > > No proof, but hints: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frame_rate#How_many_frames_per_second_can_the_human_eye_see.3F > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persistence_of_vision#Film_systems Thanks for the info. Everyone reads what's important/true that fits his/her preoccupations, so do I. > > And I can tell you from my own experience. I very rarely visit the cinema, > so I'm not to much used to the frame rate and flicker rate. The first > minutes of the movie I see the jerkyness of movements and i even see > flickering. Yes we are all equal, but not the same. > > Greets, > Kiste > > _______________________________________________ > MPlayer-users mailing list > MPlayer-users at mplayerhq.hu > https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/mplayer-users
