Dark Shadow wrote: >> Off-Topic, if one doesn't need slow-motion and the human-eye needs .05 >> seconds to view a picture, what is the benefit of those very high(er) >> framerates ? > > I am not sure I just thought if I was going to spend a lot of money on > a camcorder I should get a good one. Plus I thought it may help > considering I will be recording races and other high speed things with > it. You know how marketing-guys think, we customers think ? More is better, expensive will be better. The smaller digital cameras got worse when resolution got above 8mega-pixels, because the physical distance of the pixels caused interference and for that reason resulted in noticable more noise, which was compensated for with software-noise reduction, resulting in less picture quality. Reading/Studying Camera test-results may be a good thing to invest in some time. > _______________________________________________ > MPlayer-users mailing list > MPlayer-users at mplayerhq.hu > https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/mplayer-users
