On Jun 20, 2009, at 8:10 PM, Mark Guptill wrote:
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Ergzay<ergzay@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jun 20, 2009, at 12:05 AM, RC wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:45:42 -0400
Ergzay <ergzay@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The framerate is not changed and you end up with duplicated frames
which leaves a VERY jerky video, especially on any scenes with
panning.
Long ago there was a patch that added -ofps for MPlayer submitted to
the list. It was never accepted, and certainly won't apply cleanly
without lots of work, and probably won't work with after all of
that.
If you want to use a maybe 3 year-old version of MPlayer, however,
you're all set.
It really doesn't exist, huh? Dang, I had thought for sure there
was some
possible way of doing it. Seriously, to any developers reading
this, please
add this, it is both simple to add and very required. There is no
point for
an inverse-telecine filter if it can't do it right. Using mencoder
to encode
a video just to watch it is such a ridiculous hack. Not to mention
half the
filters dont work correctly with mencoder and it behaves very
differently to
other options. I would be willing to offer up some money through a
paypal
donation to someone willing to spend some time to do this.
_______________________________________________
MPlayer-users mailing list
MPlayer-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/mplayer-users
I usually use -vf pullup,yadif=0 when watching a mixed fps dvd
_______________________________________________
MPlayer-users mailing list
MPlayer-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/mplayer-users
Oh wow... That works. Could you explain how it works? I've never heard
of putting a inverse-telecine filter back to back with deinterlace
filter. Also, I've only looked at it briefly, but are there any
drawbacks?
_______________________________________________
MPlayer-users mailing list
MPlayer-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/mplayer-users
