Re: loosing part of the picture with resizing?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]<

 



Bernd Butscheidt pisze:
But I am still confused:
- Why do I need the video filter expand on top? Leaving it out leads to > the resolution 720*406 (using 720:-2) or 720*400 (using 720:-10).> Using the expand filter on top leads to a resolution of 736*416.
Some encoders like it to be multiple of 16 or 8 - read about desired encoder and it's limitations ( AVC *likes* dimension to be a multiple of 16 where MPEG2 *needs* it to be multiple of 16 - macroblock 16x16 )

- I would have expected to use "-vf scale=720:-3" or "-vf scale=720:-11" > to use the original aspect ratio instead of the "prescaled" (I tried it, > the resolution doesen't change again and stays at 720*576 although > mencoder recognizes it as 16:9). Where is the aspect ratio prescaled?
Maybe "prescaled" means scale to square pixels where "original"is to preserve anamorphic pixels...In the example maybe it will be a better option to expand without given aspect:
"-vf scale=720:-2,expand=::::::16"
-- Krzysztof 'DK75' DuchnowskiGetFirefox - http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/Konfiguracja UTF-8 dla czytników - http://evil.pl/pip/utf/_______________________________________________MPlayer-users mailing listMPlayer-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/mplayer-users


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux