The patch titled
Subject: memcontrol: use N_MEMORY instead N_HIGH_MEMORY
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
memcontrol-use-n_memory-instead-n_high_memory.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: memcontrol: use N_MEMORY instead N_HIGH_MEMORY
N_HIGH_MEMORY stands for the nodes that has normal or high memory.
N_MEMORY stands for the nodes that has any memory.
The code here need to handle with the nodes which have memory, we should
use N_MEMORY instead.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Hillf Danton <dhillf@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Lin Feng <linfeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 18 +++++++++---------
mm/page_cgroup.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff -puN mm/memcontrol.c~memcontrol-use-n_memory-instead-n_high_memory mm/memcontrol.c
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c~memcontrol-use-n_memory-instead-n_high_memory
+++ a/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -935,7 +935,7 @@ static unsigned long mem_cgroup_nr_lru_p
int nid;
u64 total = 0;
- for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY)
+ for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY)
total += mem_cgroup_node_nr_lru_pages(memcg, nid, lru_mask);
return total;
}
@@ -1783,9 +1783,9 @@ static void mem_cgroup_may_update_nodema
return;
/* make a nodemask where this memcg uses memory from */
- memcg->scan_nodes = node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY];
+ memcg->scan_nodes = node_states[N_MEMORY];
- for_each_node_mask(nid, node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]) {
+ for_each_node_mask(nid, node_states[N_MEMORY]) {
if (!test_mem_cgroup_node_reclaimable(memcg, nid, false))
node_clear(nid, memcg->scan_nodes);
@@ -1856,7 +1856,7 @@ static bool mem_cgroup_reclaimable(struc
/*
* Check rest of nodes.
*/
- for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
+ for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY) {
if (node_isset(nid, memcg->scan_nodes))
continue;
if (test_mem_cgroup_node_reclaimable(memcg, nid, noswap))
@@ -4684,7 +4684,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_reparent_charges(
lru_add_drain_all();
drain_all_stock_sync(memcg);
mem_cgroup_start_move(memcg);
- for_each_node_state(node, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
+ for_each_node_state(node, N_MEMORY) {
for (zid = 0; zid < MAX_NR_ZONES; zid++) {
enum lru_list lru;
for_each_lru(lru) {
@@ -5174,7 +5174,7 @@ static int memcg_numa_stat_show(struct c
total_nr = mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages(memcg, LRU_ALL);
seq_printf(m, "total=%lu", total_nr);
- for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
+ for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY) {
node_nr = mem_cgroup_node_nr_lru_pages(memcg, nid, LRU_ALL);
seq_printf(m, " N%d=%lu", nid, node_nr);
}
@@ -5182,7 +5182,7 @@ static int memcg_numa_stat_show(struct c
file_nr = mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages(memcg, LRU_ALL_FILE);
seq_printf(m, "file=%lu", file_nr);
- for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
+ for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY) {
node_nr = mem_cgroup_node_nr_lru_pages(memcg, nid,
LRU_ALL_FILE);
seq_printf(m, " N%d=%lu", nid, node_nr);
@@ -5191,7 +5191,7 @@ static int memcg_numa_stat_show(struct c
anon_nr = mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages(memcg, LRU_ALL_ANON);
seq_printf(m, "anon=%lu", anon_nr);
- for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
+ for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY) {
node_nr = mem_cgroup_node_nr_lru_pages(memcg, nid,
LRU_ALL_ANON);
seq_printf(m, " N%d=%lu", nid, node_nr);
@@ -5200,7 +5200,7 @@ static int memcg_numa_stat_show(struct c
unevictable_nr = mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages(memcg, BIT(LRU_UNEVICTABLE));
seq_printf(m, "unevictable=%lu", unevictable_nr);
- for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
+ for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY) {
node_nr = mem_cgroup_node_nr_lru_pages(memcg, nid,
BIT(LRU_UNEVICTABLE));
seq_printf(m, " N%d=%lu", nid, node_nr);
diff -puN mm/page_cgroup.c~memcontrol-use-n_memory-instead-n_high_memory mm/page_cgroup.c
--- a/mm/page_cgroup.c~memcontrol-use-n_memory-instead-n_high_memory
+++ a/mm/page_cgroup.c
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ void __init page_cgroup_init(void)
if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
return;
- for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
+ for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY) {
unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn;
start_pfn = node_start_pfn(nid);
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx are
linux-next.patch
memory_hotplug-fix-possible-incorrect-node_states.patch
slub-hotplug-ignore-unrelated-nodes-hot-adding-and-hot-removing.patch
drivers-base-nodec-cleanup-node_state_attr.patch
mm-memory-hotplug-dynamic-configure-movable-memory-and-portion-memory.patch
mm-memory-hotplug-dynamic-configure-movable-memory-and-portion-memory-fix.patch
memory_hotplug-handle-empty-zone-when-online_movable-online_kernel.patch
memory_hotplug-ensure-every-online-node-has-normal-memory.patch
node_states-introduce-n_memory.patch
cpuset-use-n_memory-instead-n_high_memory.patch
procfs-use-n_memory-instead-n_high_memory.patch
memcontrol-use-n_memory-instead-n_high_memory.patch
oom-use-n_memory-instead-n_high_memory.patch
mmmigrate-use-n_memory-instead-n_high_memory.patch
mempolicy-use-n_memory-instead-n_high_memory.patch
hugetlb-use-n_memory-instead-n_high_memory.patch
vmstat-use-n_memory-instead-n_high_memory.patch
kthread-use-n_memory-instead-n_high_memory.patch
init-use-n_memory-instead-n_high_memory.patch
vmscan-use-n_memory-instead-n_high_memory.patch
page_alloc-use-n_memory-instead-n_high_memory-change-the-node_states-initialization.patch
hotplug-update-nodemasks-management.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
