The patch titled
Subject: procfs: use N_MEMORY instead N_HIGH_MEMORY
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
procfs-use-n_memory-instead-n_high_memory.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: procfs: use N_MEMORY instead N_HIGH_MEMORY
N_HIGH_MEMORY stands for the nodes that has normal or high memory.
N_MEMORY stands for the nodes that has any memory.
The code here need to handle with the nodes which have memory, we should
use N_MEMORY instead.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Lin Feng <linfeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/proc/kcore.c | 2 +-
fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff -puN fs/proc/kcore.c~procfs-use-n_memory-instead-n_high_memory fs/proc/kcore.c
--- a/fs/proc/kcore.c~procfs-use-n_memory-instead-n_high_memory
+++ a/fs/proc/kcore.c
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ static int kcore_update_ram(void)
/* Not inialized....update now */
/* find out "max pfn" */
end_pfn = 0;
- for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
+ for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY) {
unsigned long node_end;
node_end = NODE_DATA(nid)->node_start_pfn +
NODE_DATA(nid)->node_spanned_pages;
diff -puN fs/proc/task_mmu.c~procfs-use-n_memory-instead-n_high_memory fs/proc/task_mmu.c
--- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c~procfs-use-n_memory-instead-n_high_memory
+++ a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
@@ -1126,7 +1126,7 @@ static struct page *can_gather_numa_stat
return NULL;
nid = page_to_nid(page);
- if (!node_isset(nid, node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]))
+ if (!node_isset(nid, node_states[N_MEMORY]))
return NULL;
return page;
@@ -1279,7 +1279,7 @@ static int show_numa_map(struct seq_file
if (md->writeback)
seq_printf(m, " writeback=%lu", md->writeback);
- for_each_node_state(n, N_HIGH_MEMORY)
+ for_each_node_state(n, N_MEMORY)
if (md->node[n])
seq_printf(m, " N%d=%lu", n, md->node[n]);
out:
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx are
linux-next.patch
memory_hotplug-fix-possible-incorrect-node_states.patch
slub-hotplug-ignore-unrelated-nodes-hot-adding-and-hot-removing.patch
drivers-base-nodec-cleanup-node_state_attr.patch
mm-memory-hotplug-dynamic-configure-movable-memory-and-portion-memory.patch
mm-memory-hotplug-dynamic-configure-movable-memory-and-portion-memory-fix.patch
memory_hotplug-handle-empty-zone-when-online_movable-online_kernel.patch
memory_hotplug-ensure-every-online-node-has-normal-memory.patch
node_states-introduce-n_memory.patch
cpuset-use-n_memory-instead-n_high_memory.patch
procfs-use-n_memory-instead-n_high_memory.patch
memcontrol-use-n_memory-instead-n_high_memory.patch
oom-use-n_memory-instead-n_high_memory.patch
mmmigrate-use-n_memory-instead-n_high_memory.patch
mempolicy-use-n_memory-instead-n_high_memory.patch
hugetlb-use-n_memory-instead-n_high_memory.patch
vmstat-use-n_memory-instead-n_high_memory.patch
kthread-use-n_memory-instead-n_high_memory.patch
init-use-n_memory-instead-n_high_memory.patch
vmscan-use-n_memory-instead-n_high_memory.patch
page_alloc-use-n_memory-instead-n_high_memory-change-the-node_states-initialization.patch
hotplug-update-nodemasks-management.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
