The patch titled Subject: mm, memcg: pass charge order to oom killer has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is mm-memcg-pass-charge-order-to-oom-killer.patch Before you just go and hit "reply", please: a) Consider who else should be cc'ed b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated there every 3-4 working days ------------------------------------------------------ From: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: mm, memcg: pass charge order to oom killer The oom killer typically displays the allocation order at the time of oom as a part of its diangostic messages (for global, cpuset, and mempolicy ooms). The memory controller may also pass the charge order to the oom killer so it can emit the same information. This is useful in determining how large the memory allocation is that triggered the oom killer. Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx> Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- include/linux/memcontrol.h | 3 ++- mm/memcontrol.c | 6 +++--- mm/oom_kill.c | 7 ++++--- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff -puN include/linux/memcontrol.h~mm-memcg-pass-charge-order-to-oom-killer include/linux/memcontrol.h --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h~mm-memcg-pass-charge-order-to-oom-killer +++ a/include/linux/memcontrol.h @@ -77,7 +77,8 @@ extern void mem_cgroup_uncharge_end(void extern void mem_cgroup_uncharge_page(struct page *page); extern void mem_cgroup_uncharge_cache_page(struct page *page); -extern void mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask); +extern void mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask, + int order); int task_in_mem_cgroup(struct task_struct *task, const struct mem_cgroup *memcg); extern struct mem_cgroup *try_get_mem_cgroup_from_page(struct page *page); diff -puN mm/memcontrol.c~mm-memcg-pass-charge-order-to-oom-killer mm/memcontrol.c --- a/mm/memcontrol.c~mm-memcg-pass-charge-order-to-oom-killer +++ a/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -1791,7 +1791,7 @@ static void memcg_oom_recover(struct mem /* * try to call OOM killer. returns false if we should exit memory-reclaim loop. */ -bool mem_cgroup_handle_oom(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t mask) +bool mem_cgroup_handle_oom(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t mask, int order) { struct oom_wait_info owait; bool locked, need_to_kill; @@ -1821,7 +1821,7 @@ bool mem_cgroup_handle_oom(struct mem_cg if (need_to_kill) { finish_wait(&memcg_oom_waitq, &owait.wait); - mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(memcg, mask); + mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(memcg, mask, order); } else { schedule(); finish_wait(&memcg_oom_waitq, &owait.wait); @@ -2192,7 +2192,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_do_charge(struct m if (!oom_check) return CHARGE_NOMEM; /* check OOM */ - if (!mem_cgroup_handle_oom(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask)) + if (!mem_cgroup_handle_oom(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask, get_order(csize))) return CHARGE_OOM_DIE; return CHARGE_RETRY; diff -puN mm/oom_kill.c~mm-memcg-pass-charge-order-to-oom-killer mm/oom_kill.c --- a/mm/oom_kill.c~mm-memcg-pass-charge-order-to-oom-killer +++ a/mm/oom_kill.c @@ -554,7 +554,8 @@ static void check_panic_on_oom(enum oom_ } #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR -void mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask) +void mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask, + int order) { unsigned long limit; unsigned int points = 0; @@ -570,12 +571,12 @@ void mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(struct mem return; } - check_panic_on_oom(CONSTRAINT_MEMCG, gfp_mask, 0, NULL); + check_panic_on_oom(CONSTRAINT_MEMCG, gfp_mask, order, NULL); limit = mem_cgroup_get_limit(memcg) >> PAGE_SHIFT; read_lock(&tasklist_lock); p = select_bad_process(&points, limit, memcg, NULL, false); if (p && PTR_ERR(p) != -1UL) - oom_kill_process(p, gfp_mask, 0, points, limit, memcg, NULL, + oom_kill_process(p, gfp_mask, order, points, limit, memcg, NULL, "Memory cgroup out of memory"); read_unlock(&tasklist_lock); } _ Subject: Subject: mm, memcg: pass charge order to oom killer Patches currently in -mm which might be from rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx are origin.patch linux-next.patch slab-introduce-kmalloc_array.patch mm-oom-avoid-looping-when-chosen-thread-detaches-its-mm.patch mm-oom-fold-oom_kill_task-into-oom_kill_process.patch mm-oom-do-not-emit-oom-killer-warning-if-chosen-thread-is-already-exiting.patch mm-oom-introduce-independent-oom-killer-ratelimit-state.patch mm-vmscanc-cleanup-with-s-reclaim_mode-isolate_mode.patch pagemap-avoid-splitting-thp-when-reading-proc-pid-pagemap.patch thp-optimize-away-unnecessary-page-table-locking.patch thp-optimize-away-unnecessary-page-table-locking-fix.patch pagemap-export-kpf_thp.patch pagemap-document-kpf_thp-and-make-page-types-aware-of-it.patch pagemap-introduce-data-structure-for-pagemap-entry.patch mm-oom-force-oom-kill-on-sysrqf.patch mm-memcg-pass-charge-order-to-oom-killer.patch memcg-remove-unnecessary-thp-check-in-page-stat-accounting.patch signal-give-send_sig_forced-more-power-to-beat-signal_unkillable.patch signal-cosmetic-s-from_ancestor_ns-force-in-prepare_signal-paths.patch signal-oom_kill_task-use-send_sig_forced-instead-of-force_sig.patch signal-zap_pid_ns_processes-s-send_sig_noinfo-send_sig_forced.patch usermodehelper-introduce-umh_completesub_info.patch usermodehelper-implement-umh_killable.patch usermodehelper-kill-umh_wait-renumber-umh_-constants.patch usermodehelper-____call_usermodehelper-doesnt-need-do_exit.patch kmod-introduce-call_modprobe-helper.patch kmod-make-__request_module-killable.patch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html