The patch titled
fail_make_request: cleanup should_fail_request
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
fail_make_request-cleanup-should_fail_request.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
See http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
out what to do about this
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: fail_make_request: cleanup should_fail_request
From: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx>
This changes should_fail_request() to more usable wrapper function of
should_fail(). It can avoid putting #ifdef CONFIG_FAIL_MAKE_REQUEST in
the middle of a function.
Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
block/blk-core.c | 26 ++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff -puN block/blk-core.c~fail_make_request-cleanup-should_fail_request block/blk-core.c
--- a/block/blk-core.c~fail_make_request-cleanup-should_fail_request
+++ a/block/blk-core.c
@@ -1357,14 +1357,9 @@ static int __init setup_fail_make_reques
}
__setup("fail_make_request=", setup_fail_make_request);
-static int should_fail_request(struct bio *bio)
+static bool should_fail_request(struct hd_struct *part, unsigned int bytes)
{
- struct hd_struct *part = bio->bi_bdev->bd_part;
-
- if (part_to_disk(part)->part0.make_it_fail || part->make_it_fail)
- return should_fail(&fail_make_request, bio->bi_size);
-
- return 0;
+ return part->make_it_fail && should_fail(&fail_make_request, bytes);
}
static int __init fail_make_request_debugfs(void)
@@ -1377,9 +1372,10 @@ late_initcall(fail_make_request_debugfs)
#else /* CONFIG_FAIL_MAKE_REQUEST */
-static inline int should_fail_request(struct bio *bio)
+static inline bool should_fail_request(struct hd_struct *part,
+ unsigned int bytes)
{
- return 0;
+ return false;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_FAIL_MAKE_REQUEST */
@@ -1462,6 +1458,7 @@ static inline void __generic_make_reques
old_dev = 0;
do {
char b[BDEVNAME_SIZE];
+ struct hd_struct *part;
q = bdev_get_queue(bio->bi_bdev);
if (unlikely(!q)) {
@@ -1485,7 +1482,10 @@ static inline void __generic_make_reques
if (unlikely(test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_DEAD, &q->queue_flags)))
goto end_io;
- if (should_fail_request(bio))
+ part = bio->bi_bdev->bd_part;
+ if (should_fail_request(part, bio->bi_size) ||
+ should_fail_request(&part_to_disk(part)->part0,
+ bio->bi_size))
goto end_io;
/*
@@ -1700,11 +1700,9 @@ int blk_insert_cloned_request(struct req
if (blk_rq_check_limits(q, rq))
return -EIO;
-#ifdef CONFIG_FAIL_MAKE_REQUEST
- if (rq->rq_disk && rq->rq_disk->part0.make_it_fail &&
- should_fail(&fail_make_request, blk_rq_bytes(rq)))
+ if (rq->rq_disk &&
+ should_fail_request(&rq->rq_disk->part0, blk_rq_bytes(rq)))
return -EIO;
-#endif
spin_lock_irqsave(q->queue_lock, flags);
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx are
linux-next.patch
ext4-use-proper-little-endian-bitops.patch
ocfs2-avoid-unaligned-access-to-dqc_bitmap.patch
reiserfs-use-proper-little-endian-bitops.patch
reiserfs-use-hweight_long.patch
fault-injection-do-not-include-unneeded-header.patch
fault-injection-remove-nonexistent-function-extern.patch
fault-injection-cleanup-simple-attribute-of-stacktrace_depth.patch
fault-injection-use-debugfs_remove_recursive.patch
failslab-simplify-debugfs-initialization.patch
fail_page_alloc-simplify-debugfs-initialization.patch
fail_make_request-cleanup-should_fail_request.patch
asm-generic-add-another-generic-ext2-atomic-bitops.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
