The quilt patch titled
Subject: mm/swap: fold lru_rotate into cpu_fbatches
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-swap-fold-lru_rotate-into-cpu_fbatches.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
------------------------------------------------------
From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm/swap: fold lru_rotate into cpu_fbatches
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 20:13:15 -0600
Fold lru_rotate into cpu_fbatches, and rename the folio_batch and the lock
protecting it to lru_move_tail and lock_irq respectively so that all the
boilerplate can be removed at the end of this series.
Also remove data_race() around folio_batch_count(), which is out of place:
all folio_batch_count() calls on remote cpu_fbatches are subject to
data_race(), and therefore data_race() should be inside
folio_batch_count().
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240711021317.596178-4-yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/swap.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/swap.c~mm-swap-fold-lru_rotate-into-cpu_fbatches
+++ a/mm/swap.c
@@ -47,20 +47,11 @@
int page_cluster;
const int page_cluster_max = 31;
-/* Protecting only lru_rotate.fbatch which requires disabling interrupts */
-struct lru_rotate {
- local_lock_t lock;
- struct folio_batch fbatch;
-};
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct lru_rotate, lru_rotate) = {
- .lock = INIT_LOCAL_LOCK(lock),
-};
-
-/*
- * The following folio batches are grouped together because they are protected
- * by disabling preemption (and interrupts remain enabled).
- */
struct cpu_fbatches {
+ /*
+ * The following folio batches are grouped together because they are protected
+ * by disabling preemption (and interrupts remain enabled).
+ */
local_lock_t lock;
struct folio_batch lru_add;
struct folio_batch lru_deactivate_file;
@@ -69,9 +60,14 @@ struct cpu_fbatches {
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
struct folio_batch lru_activate;
#endif
+ /* Protecting the following batches which require disabling interrupts */
+ local_lock_t lock_irq;
+ struct folio_batch lru_move_tail;
};
+
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_fbatches, cpu_fbatches) = {
.lock = INIT_LOCAL_LOCK(lock),
+ .lock_irq = INIT_LOCAL_LOCK(lock_irq),
};
static void __page_cache_release(struct folio *folio, struct lruvec **lruvecp,
@@ -267,10 +263,10 @@ void folio_rotate_reclaimable(struct fol
return;
}
- local_lock_irqsave(&lru_rotate.lock, flags);
- fbatch = this_cpu_ptr(&lru_rotate.fbatch);
+ local_lock_irqsave(&cpu_fbatches.lock_irq, flags);
+ fbatch = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_fbatches.lru_move_tail);
folio_batch_add_and_move(fbatch, folio, lru_move_tail_fn);
- local_unlock_irqrestore(&lru_rotate.lock, flags);
+ local_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_fbatches.lock_irq, flags);
}
void lru_note_cost(struct lruvec *lruvec, bool file,
@@ -668,15 +664,15 @@ void lru_add_drain_cpu(int cpu)
if (folio_batch_count(fbatch))
folio_batch_move_lru(fbatch, lru_add_fn);
- fbatch = &per_cpu(lru_rotate.fbatch, cpu);
+ fbatch = &fbatches->lru_move_tail;
/* Disabling interrupts below acts as a compiler barrier. */
if (data_race(folio_batch_count(fbatch))) {
unsigned long flags;
/* No harm done if a racing interrupt already did this */
- local_lock_irqsave(&lru_rotate.lock, flags);
+ local_lock_irqsave(&cpu_fbatches.lock_irq, flags);
folio_batch_move_lru(fbatch, lru_move_tail_fn);
- local_unlock_irqrestore(&lru_rotate.lock, flags);
+ local_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_fbatches.lock_irq, flags);
}
fbatch = &fbatches->lru_deactivate_file;
@@ -825,7 +821,7 @@ static bool cpu_needs_drain(unsigned int
/* Check these in order of likelihood that they're not zero */
return folio_batch_count(&fbatches->lru_add) ||
- data_race(folio_batch_count(&per_cpu(lru_rotate.fbatch, cpu))) ||
+ folio_batch_count(&fbatches->lru_move_tail) ||
folio_batch_count(&fbatches->lru_deactivate_file) ||
folio_batch_count(&fbatches->lru_deactivate) ||
folio_batch_count(&fbatches->lru_lazyfree) ||
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx are
mm-contig_alloc-support-__gfp_comp.patch
mm-cma-add-cma_allocfree_folio.patch
mm-cma-add-cma_allocfree_folio-fix.patch
mm-hugetlb-use-__gfp_comp-for-gigantic-folios.patch
mm-free-zapped-tail-pages-when-splitting-isolated-thp.patch
mm-remap-unused-subpages-to-shared-zeropage-when-splitting-isolated-thp.patch
