The quilt patch titled
Subject: mm/memcg: fix obsolete function name in mem_cgroup_protection()
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-memcg-fix-obsolete-function-name-in-mem_cgroup_protection.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
------------------------------------------------------
From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm/memcg: fix obsolete function name in mem_cgroup_protection()
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 19:59:34 +0800
Commit 45c7f7e1ef17 ("mm, memcg: decouple e{low,min} state mutations from
protection checks") changed the function name but not the corresponding
comment.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230727115934.657787-1-linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/memcontrol.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h~mm-memcg-fix-obsolete-function-name-in-mem_cgroup_protection
+++ a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -582,7 +582,7 @@ static inline void mem_cgroup_protection
/*
* There is no reclaim protection applied to a targeted reclaim.
* We are special casing this specific case here because
- * mem_cgroup_protected calculation is not robust enough to keep
+ * mem_cgroup_calculate_protection is not robust enough to keep
* the protection invariant for calculated effective values for
* parallel reclaimers with different reclaim target. This is
* especially a problem for tail memcgs (as they have pages on LRU)
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx are
mm-memory-failure-add-pageoffline-check.patch
mm-memory-failure-fix-potential-page-refcnt-leak-in-memory_failure.patch
