From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: kasan: improve vmalloc tests Update the existing vmalloc_oob() test to account for the specifics of the tag-based modes. Also add a few new checks and comments. Add new vmalloc-related tests: - vmalloc_helpers_tags() to check that exported vmalloc helpers can handle tagged pointers. - vmap_tags() to check that SW_TAGS mode properly tags vmap() mappings. - vm_map_ram_tags() to check that SW_TAGS mode properly tags vm_map_ram() mappings. - vmalloc_percpu() to check that SW_TAGS mode tags regions allocated for __alloc_percpu(). The tagging of per-cpu mappings is best-effort; proper tagging is tracked in [1]. [1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215019 [sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: similar to "kasan: test: fix compatibility with FORTIFY_SOURCE"] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220128144801.73f5ced0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxx> [andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx: vmap_tags() and vm_map_ram_tags() pass invalid page array size] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/865c91ba49b90623ab50c7526b79ccb955f544f0.1644950160.git.andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx [andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx: set_memory_rw/ro() are not exported to modules] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/019ac41602e0c4a7dfe96dc8158a95097c2b2ebd.1645554036.git.andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx [akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: fix build] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/bbdc1c0501c5275e7f26fdb8e2a7b14a40a9f36b.1643047180.git.andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Marco Elver <elver@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> Cc: Peter Collingbourne <pcc@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx> Cc: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- lib/test_kasan.c | 194 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 188 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) --- a/lib/test_kasan.c~kasan-improve-vmalloc-tests +++ a/lib/test_kasan.c @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ #include <linux/uaccess.h> #include <linux/io.h> #include <linux/vmalloc.h> +#include <linux/set_memory.h> #include <asm/page.h> @@ -1057,21 +1058,186 @@ static void kmalloc_double_kzfree(struct KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, kfree_sensitive(ptr)); } +static void vmalloc_helpers_tags(struct kunit *test) +{ + void *ptr; + + /* This test is intended for tag-based modes. */ + KASAN_TEST_NEEDS_CONFIG_OFF(test, CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC); + + KASAN_TEST_NEEDS_CONFIG_ON(test, CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC); + + ptr = vmalloc(PAGE_SIZE); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr); + + /* Check that the returned pointer is tagged. */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, (u8)get_tag(ptr), (u8)KASAN_TAG_MIN); + KUNIT_EXPECT_LT(test, (u8)get_tag(ptr), (u8)KASAN_TAG_KERNEL); + + /* Make sure exported vmalloc helpers handle tagged pointers. */ + KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, is_vmalloc_addr(ptr)); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, vmalloc_to_page(ptr)); + +#if !IS_MODULE(CONFIG_KASAN_KUNIT_TEST) + { + int rv; + + /* Make sure vmalloc'ed memory permissions can be changed. */ + rv = set_memory_ro((unsigned long)ptr, 1); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GE(test, rv, 0); + rv = set_memory_rw((unsigned long)ptr, 1); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GE(test, rv, 0); + } +#endif + + vfree(ptr); +} + static void vmalloc_oob(struct kunit *test) { - void *area; + char *v_ptr, *p_ptr; + struct page *page; + size_t size = PAGE_SIZE / 2 - KASAN_GRANULE_SIZE - 5; KASAN_TEST_NEEDS_CONFIG_ON(test, CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC); + v_ptr = vmalloc(size); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, v_ptr); + + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(v_ptr); + /* - * We have to be careful not to hit the guard page. + * We have to be careful not to hit the guard page in vmalloc tests. * The MMU will catch that and crash us. */ - area = vmalloc(3000); - KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, area); - KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, ((volatile char *)area)[3100]); - vfree(area); + /* Make sure in-bounds accesses are valid. */ + v_ptr[0] = 0; + v_ptr[size - 1] = 0; + + /* + * An unaligned access past the requested vmalloc size. + * Only generic KASAN can precisely detect these. + */ + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC)) + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, ((volatile char *)v_ptr)[size]); + + /* An aligned access into the first out-of-bounds granule. */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, ((volatile char *)v_ptr)[size + 5]); + + /* Check that in-bounds accesses to the physical page are valid. */ + page = vmalloc_to_page(v_ptr); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, page); + p_ptr = page_address(page); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, p_ptr); + p_ptr[0] = 0; + + vfree(v_ptr); + + /* + * We can't check for use-after-unmap bugs in this nor in the following + * vmalloc tests, as the page might be fully unmapped and accessing it + * will crash the kernel. + */ +} + +static void vmap_tags(struct kunit *test) +{ + char *p_ptr, *v_ptr; + struct page *p_page, *v_page; + + /* + * This test is specifically crafted for the software tag-based mode, + * the only tag-based mode that poisons vmap mappings. + */ + KASAN_TEST_NEEDS_CONFIG_ON(test, CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS); + + KASAN_TEST_NEEDS_CONFIG_ON(test, CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC); + + p_page = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL, 1); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, p_page); + p_ptr = page_address(p_page); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, p_ptr); + + v_ptr = vmap(&p_page, 1, VM_MAP, PAGE_KERNEL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, v_ptr); + + /* + * We can't check for out-of-bounds bugs in this nor in the following + * vmalloc tests, as allocations have page granularity and accessing + * the guard page will crash the kernel. + */ + + KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, (u8)get_tag(v_ptr), (u8)KASAN_TAG_MIN); + KUNIT_EXPECT_LT(test, (u8)get_tag(v_ptr), (u8)KASAN_TAG_KERNEL); + + /* Make sure that in-bounds accesses through both pointers work. */ + *p_ptr = 0; + *v_ptr = 0; + + /* Make sure vmalloc_to_page() correctly recovers the page pointer. */ + v_page = vmalloc_to_page(v_ptr); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, v_page); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, p_page, v_page); + + vunmap(v_ptr); + free_pages((unsigned long)p_ptr, 1); +} + +static void vm_map_ram_tags(struct kunit *test) +{ + char *p_ptr, *v_ptr; + struct page *page; + + /* + * This test is specifically crafted for the software tag-based mode, + * the only tag-based mode that poisons vm_map_ram mappings. + */ + KASAN_TEST_NEEDS_CONFIG_ON(test, CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS); + + page = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL, 1); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, page); + p_ptr = page_address(page); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, p_ptr); + + v_ptr = vm_map_ram(&page, 1, -1); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, v_ptr); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, (u8)get_tag(v_ptr), (u8)KASAN_TAG_MIN); + KUNIT_EXPECT_LT(test, (u8)get_tag(v_ptr), (u8)KASAN_TAG_KERNEL); + + /* Make sure that in-bounds accesses through both pointers work. */ + *p_ptr = 0; + *v_ptr = 0; + + vm_unmap_ram(v_ptr, 1); + free_pages((unsigned long)p_ptr, 1); +} + +static void vmalloc_percpu(struct kunit *test) +{ + char __percpu *ptr; + int cpu; + + /* + * This test is specifically crafted for the software tag-based mode, + * the only tag-based mode that poisons percpu mappings. + */ + KASAN_TEST_NEEDS_CONFIG_ON(test, CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS); + + ptr = __alloc_percpu(PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE); + + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { + char *c_ptr = per_cpu_ptr(ptr, cpu); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, (u8)get_tag(c_ptr), (u8)KASAN_TAG_MIN); + KUNIT_EXPECT_LT(test, (u8)get_tag(c_ptr), (u8)KASAN_TAG_KERNEL); + + /* Make sure that in-bounds accesses don't crash the kernel. */ + *c_ptr = 0; + } + + free_percpu(ptr); } /* @@ -1105,6 +1271,18 @@ static void match_all_not_assigned(struc KUNIT_EXPECT_LT(test, (u8)get_tag(ptr), (u8)KASAN_TAG_KERNEL); free_pages((unsigned long)ptr, order); } + + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC)) + return; + + for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) { + size = (get_random_int() % 1024) + 1; + ptr = vmalloc(size); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr); + KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, (u8)get_tag(ptr), (u8)KASAN_TAG_MIN); + KUNIT_EXPECT_LT(test, (u8)get_tag(ptr), (u8)KASAN_TAG_KERNEL); + vfree(ptr); + } } /* Check that 0xff works as a match-all pointer tag for tag-based modes. */ @@ -1210,7 +1388,11 @@ static struct kunit_case kasan_kunit_tes KUNIT_CASE(kasan_bitops_generic), KUNIT_CASE(kasan_bitops_tags), KUNIT_CASE(kmalloc_double_kzfree), + KUNIT_CASE(vmalloc_helpers_tags), KUNIT_CASE(vmalloc_oob), + KUNIT_CASE(vmap_tags), + KUNIT_CASE(vm_map_ram_tags), + KUNIT_CASE(vmalloc_percpu), KUNIT_CASE(match_all_not_assigned), KUNIT_CASE(match_all_ptr_tag), KUNIT_CASE(match_all_mem_tag), _
