+ mm-swap-remove-confusing-checking-for-non_swap_entry-in-swap_ra_info.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: mm/swap: remove confusing checking for non_swap_entry() in swap_ra_info()
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     mm-swap-remove-confusing-checking-for-non_swap_entry-in-swap_ra_info.patch

This patch should soon appear at
    https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-swap-remove-confusing-checking-for-non_swap_entry-in-swap_ra_info.patch
and later at
    https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/mm-swap-remove-confusing-checking-for-non_swap_entry-in-swap_ra_info.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm/swap: remove confusing checking for non_swap_entry() in swap_ra_info()

The non_swap_entry() was used for working with VMA based swap readahead
via commit ec560175c0b6 ("mm, swap: VMA based swap readahead").  At that
time, the non_swap_entry() checking is necessary because the function is
called before checking that in do_swap_page().  Then it's moved to
swap_ra_info() since commit eaf649ebc3ac ("mm: swap: clean up swap
readahead").  After that, the non_swap_entry() checking is unnecessary,
because swap_ra_info() is called after non_swap_entry() has been checked
already.  The resulting code is confusing as the non_swap_entry() check
looks racy now because while we released the pte lock, somebody else might
have faulted in this pte.  So we should check whether it's swap pte first
to guard against such race or swap_type will be unexpected.  But the race
isn't important because it will not cause problem.  We would have enough
checking when we really operate the PTE entries later.  So we remove the
non_swap_entry() check here to avoid confusion.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210426123316.806267-4-linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dennis Zhou <dennis@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 mm/swap_state.c |    6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/swap_state.c~mm-swap-remove-confusing-checking-for-non_swap_entry-in-swap_ra_info
+++ a/mm/swap_state.c
@@ -721,7 +721,6 @@ static void swap_ra_info(struct vm_fault
 {
 	struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma;
 	unsigned long ra_val;
-	swp_entry_t entry;
 	unsigned long faddr, pfn, fpfn;
 	unsigned long start, end;
 	pte_t *pte, *orig_pte;
@@ -739,11 +738,6 @@ static void swap_ra_info(struct vm_fault
 
 	faddr = vmf->address;
 	orig_pte = pte = pte_offset_map(vmf->pmd, faddr);
-	entry = pte_to_swp_entry(*pte);
-	if ((unlikely(non_swap_entry(entry)))) {
-		pte_unmap(orig_pte);
-		return;
-	}
 
 	fpfn = PFN_DOWN(faddr);
 	ra_val = GET_SWAP_RA_VAL(vma);
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx are

mm-swapfile-use-percpu_ref-to-serialize-against-concurrent-swapoff.patch
swap-fix-do_swap_page-race-with-swapoff.patch
mm-swap-remove-confusing-checking-for-non_swap_entry-in-swap_ra_info.patch
mm-shmem-fix-shmem_swapin-race-with-swapoff.patch




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux