The patch titled
Subject: proc-provide-details-on-indirect-branch-speculation-v2
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
proc-provide-details-on-indirect-branch-speculation-v2.patch
This patch was dropped because it was folded into proc-provide-details-on-indirect-branch-speculation.patch
------------------------------------------------------
From: Anand K Mistry <amistry@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: proc-provide-details-on-indirect-branch-speculation-v2
remove underscores from field name to workaround documentation issue
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201106131015.v2.1.I7782b0cedb705384a634cfd8898eb7523562da99@changeid
Signed-off-by: Anand K Mistry <amistry@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst | 4 ++--
fs/proc/array.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst~proc-provide-details-on-indirect-branch-speculation-v2
+++ a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ read the file /proc/PID/status::
NoNewPrivs: 0
Seccomp: 0
Speculation_Store_Bypass: thread vulnerable
- Speculation_Indirect_Branch: conditional enabled
+ SpeculationIndirectBranch: conditional enabled
voluntary_ctxt_switches: 0
nonvoluntary_ctxt_switches: 1
@@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ It's slow but very precise.
NoNewPrivs no_new_privs, like prctl(PR_GET_NO_NEW_PRIV, ...)
Seccomp seccomp mode, like prctl(PR_GET_SECCOMP, ...)
Speculation_Store_Bypass speculative store bypass mitigation status
- Speculation_Indirect_Branch indirect branch speculation mode
+ SpeculationIndirectBranch indirect branch speculation mode
Cpus_allowed mask of CPUs on which this process may run
Cpus_allowed_list Same as previous, but in "list format"
Mems_allowed mask of memory nodes allowed to this process
--- a/fs/proc/array.c~proc-provide-details-on-indirect-branch-speculation-v2
+++ a/fs/proc/array.c
@@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ static inline void task_seccomp(struct s
break;
}
- seq_puts(m, "\nSpeculation_Indirect_Branch:\t");
+ seq_puts(m, "\nSpeculationIndirectBranch:\t");
switch (arch_prctl_spec_ctrl_get(p, PR_SPEC_INDIRECT_BRANCH)) {
case -EINVAL:
seq_puts(m, "unsupported");
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from amistry@xxxxxxxxxx are
proc-provide-details-on-indirect-branch-speculation.patch
