The patch titled
Subject: drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c: fix missing include of <linux/rio_drv.h>
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
drivers-rapidio-rio-accessc-fix-missing-include-of-linux-rio_drvh.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: "Ben Dooks (Codethink)" <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c: fix missing include of <linux/rio_drv.h>
Include <linux/rio_drv.h> for the missing declarations of functions
exported from this file. Fixes the following sparse warnings:
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:59:1: warning: symbol '__rio_local_read_config_8' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:60:1: warning: symbol '__rio_local_read_config_16' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:61:1: warning: symbol '__rio_local_read_config_32' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:62:1: warning: symbol '__rio_local_write_config_8' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:63:1: warning: symbol '__rio_local_write_config_16' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:64:1: warning: symbol '__rio_local_write_config_32' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:112:1: warning: symbol 'rio_mport_read_config_8' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:113:1: warning: symbol 'rio_mport_read_config_16' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:114:1: warning: symbol 'rio_mport_read_config_32' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:115:1: warning: symbol 'rio_mport_write_config_8' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:116:1: warning: symbol 'rio_mport_write_config_16' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:117:1: warning: symbol 'rio_mport_write_config_32' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:136:5: warning: symbol 'rio_mport_send_doorbell' was not declared. Should it be static?
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191017115103.684-1-ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Matt Porter <mporter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alexandre Bounine <alex.bou9@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
--- a/drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c~drivers-rapidio-rio-accessc-fix-missing-include-of-linux-rio_drvh
+++ a/drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c
@@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
#include <linux/rio.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/rio_drv.h>
+
/*
* Wrappers for all RIO configuration access functions. They just check
* alignment and call the low-level functions pointed to by rio_mport->ops.
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are
