The patch titled
Subject: drivers/rapidio/rio-driver.c: fix missing include of <linux/rio_drv.h>
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
rapidio-fix-missing-include-of-linux-rio_drvh.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: "Ben Dooks (Codethink)" <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: drivers/rapidio/rio-driver.c: fix missing include of <linux/rio_drv.h>
Include <linux/rio_drv.h> for the missing declarations of functions
exported from this file. Fixes the following sparse warnings:
drivers/rapidio/rio-driver.c:53:16: warning: symbol 'rio_dev_get' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/rapidio/rio-driver.c:70:6: warning: symbol 'rio_dev_put' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/rapidio/rio-driver.c:150:5: warning: symbol 'rio_register_driver' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/rapidio/rio-driver.c:169:6: warning: symbol 'rio_unregister_driver' was not declared. Should it be static?
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191017114923.10888-1-ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Matt Porter <mporter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alexandre Bounine <alex.bou9@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/rapidio/rio-driver.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/drivers/rapidio/rio-driver.c~rapidio-fix-missing-include-of-linux-rio_drvh
+++ a/drivers/rapidio/rio-driver.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/rio.h>
#include <linux/rio_ids.h>
+#include <linux/rio_drv.h>
#include "rio.h"
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are
