The patch titled
Subject: drivers/base/node.c: simplify unregister_memory_block_under_nodes()
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
drivers-base-nodec-simplify-unregister_memory_block_under_nodes.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: drivers/base/node.c: simplify unregister_memory_block_under_nodes()
We don't allow to offline memory block devices that belong to multiple
numa nodes. Therefore, such devices can never get removed. It is
sufficient to process a single node when removing the memory block. No
need to iterate over each and every PFN.
We already have the nid stored for each memory block. Make sure that the
nid always has a sane value.
Please note that checking for node_online(nid) is not required. If we
would have a memory block belonging to a node that is no longer offline,
then we would have a BUG in the node offlining code.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190719135244.15242-1-david@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/base/memory.c | 1 +
drivers/base/node.c | 39 +++++++++++++++------------------------
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/base/memory.c~drivers-base-nodec-simplify-unregister_memory_block_under_nodes
+++ a/drivers/base/memory.c
@@ -674,6 +674,7 @@ static int init_memory_block(struct memo
mem->state = state;
start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem->start_section_nr);
mem->phys_device = arch_get_memory_phys_device(start_pfn);
+ mem->nid = NUMA_NO_NODE;
ret = register_memory(mem);
--- a/drivers/base/node.c~drivers-base-nodec-simplify-unregister_memory_block_under_nodes
+++ a/drivers/base/node.c
@@ -759,8 +759,6 @@ static int register_mem_sect_under_node(
int ret, nid = *(int *)arg;
unsigned long pfn, sect_start_pfn, sect_end_pfn;
- mem_blk->nid = nid;
-
sect_start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem_blk->start_section_nr);
sect_end_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem_blk->end_section_nr);
sect_end_pfn += PAGES_PER_SECTION - 1;
@@ -789,6 +787,13 @@ static int register_mem_sect_under_node(
if (page_nid != nid)
continue;
}
+
+ /*
+ * If this memory block spans multiple nodes, we only indicate
+ * the last processed node.
+ */
+ mem_blk->nid = nid;
+
ret = sysfs_create_link_nowarn(&node_devices[nid]->dev.kobj,
&mem_blk->dev.kobj,
kobject_name(&mem_blk->dev.kobj));
@@ -804,32 +809,18 @@ static int register_mem_sect_under_node(
}
/*
- * Unregister memory block device under all nodes that it spans.
- * Has to be called with mem_sysfs_mutex held (due to unlinked_nodes).
+ * Unregister a memory block device under the node it spans. Memory blocks
+ * with multiple nodes cannot be offlined and therefore also never be removed.
*/
void unregister_memory_block_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk)
{
- unsigned long pfn, sect_start_pfn, sect_end_pfn;
- static nodemask_t unlinked_nodes;
-
- nodes_clear(unlinked_nodes);
- sect_start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem_blk->start_section_nr);
- sect_end_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem_blk->end_section_nr);
- for (pfn = sect_start_pfn; pfn <= sect_end_pfn; pfn++) {
- int nid;
+ if (mem_blk->nid == NUMA_NO_NODE)
+ return;
- nid = get_nid_for_pfn(pfn);
- if (nid < 0)
- continue;
- if (!node_online(nid))
- continue;
- if (node_test_and_set(nid, unlinked_nodes))
- continue;
- sysfs_remove_link(&node_devices[nid]->dev.kobj,
- kobject_name(&mem_blk->dev.kobj));
- sysfs_remove_link(&mem_blk->dev.kobj,
- kobject_name(&node_devices[nid]->dev.kobj));
- }
+ sysfs_remove_link(&node_devices[mem_blk->nid]->dev.kobj,
+ kobject_name(&mem_blk->dev.kobj));
+ sysfs_remove_link(&mem_blk->dev.kobj,
+ kobject_name(&node_devices[mem_blk->nid]->dev.kobj));
}
int link_mem_sections(int nid, unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from david@xxxxxxxxxx are
