The patch titled
Subject: arm64: mm: add p?d_leaf() definitions
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
arm64-mm-add-pd_leaf-definitions.patch
This patch should soon appear at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/arm64-mm-add-pd_leaf-definitions.patch
and later at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/arm64-mm-add-pd_leaf-definitions.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Steven Price <steven.price@xxxxxxx>
Subject: arm64: mm: add p?d_leaf() definitions
walk_page_range() is going to be allowed to walk page tables other than
those of user space. For this it needs to know when it has reached a
'leaf' entry in the page tables. This information will be provided by the
p?d_leaf() functions/macros.
For arm64, we already have p?d_sect() macros which we can reuse for
p?d_leaf().
pud_sect() is defined as a dummy function when CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS < 3
or CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES is defined. However when the kernel is
configured this way then architecturally it isn't allowed to have a large
page that this level, and any code using these page walking macros is
implicitly relying on the page size/number of levels being the same as the
kernel. So it is safe to reuse this for p?d_leaf() as it is an
architectural restriction.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190722154210.42799-4-steven.price@xxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h~arm64-mm-add-pd_leaf-definitions
+++ a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -446,6 +446,7 @@ extern pgprot_t phys_mem_access_prot(str
PMD_TYPE_TABLE)
#define pmd_sect(pmd) ((pmd_val(pmd) & PMD_TYPE_MASK) == \
PMD_TYPE_SECT)
+#define pmd_leaf(pmd) pmd_sect(pmd)
#if defined(CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES) || CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS < 3
#define pud_sect(pud) (0)
@@ -528,6 +529,7 @@ static inline void pte_unmap(pte_t *pte)
#define pud_none(pud) (!pud_val(pud))
#define pud_bad(pud) (!(pud_val(pud) & PUD_TABLE_BIT))
#define pud_present(pud) pte_present(pud_pte(pud))
+#define pud_leaf(pud) pud_sect(pud)
#define pud_valid(pud) pte_valid(pud_pte(pud))
static inline void set_pud(pud_t *pudp, pud_t pud)
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from steven.price@xxxxxxx are
arc-mm-add-pd_leaf-definitions.patch
arm-mm-add-pd_leaf-definitions.patch
arm64-mm-add-pd_leaf-definitions.patch
mips-mm-add-pd_leaf-definitions.patch
powerpc-mm-add-pd_leaf-definitions.patch
riscv-mm-add-pd_leaf-definitions.patch
s390-mm-add-pd_leaf-definitions.patch
sparc-mm-add-pd_leaf-definitions.patch
x86-mm-add-pd_leaf-definitions.patch
mm-add-generic-pd_leaf-macros.patch
mm-pagewalk-add-p4d_entry-and-pgd_entry.patch
mm-pagewalk-allow-walking-without-vma.patch
mm-pagewalk-add-test_pd-callbacks.patch
x86-mm-dont-display-pages-which-arent-present-in-debugfs.patch
x86-mm-point-to-struct-seq_file-from-struct-pg_state.patch
x86-mmefi-convert-ptdump_walk_pgd_level-to-take-a-mm_struct.patch
x86-mm-convert-ptdump_walk_pgd_level_debugfs-to-take-an-mm_struct.patch
x86-mm-convert-ptdump_walk_pgd_level_core-to-take-an-mm_struct.patch
mm-add-generic-ptdump.patch
x86-mm-convert-dump_pagetables-to-use-walk_page_range.patch
arm64-mm-convert-mm-dumpc-to-use-walk_page_range.patch
