+ hfsplus-fix-return-value-of-hfsplus_get_block.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: hfsplus: fix return value of hfsplus_get_block()
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     hfsplus-fix-return-value-of-hfsplus_get_block.patch

This patch should soon appear at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/hfsplus-fix-return-value-of-hfsplus_get_block.patch
and later at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/hfsplus-fix-return-value-of-hfsplus_get_block.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Ernesto A. Fernandez <ernesto.mnd.fernandez@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: hfsplus: fix return value of hfsplus_get_block()

Direct writes to empty inodes fail with EIO.  The generic direct-io code
is in part to blame (a patch has been submitted as "direct-io: allow
direct writes to empty inodes"), but hfsplus is worse affected than the
other filesystems because the fallback to buffered I/O doesn't happen.

The problem is the return value of hfsplus_get_block() when called with
!create.  Change it to be more consistent with the other modules.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/2cd1301404ec7cf1e39c8f11a01a4302f1460ad6.1539195310.git.ernesto.mnd.fernandez@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Ernesto A. Fernandez <ernesto.mnd.fernandez@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---


diff -puN fs/hfsplus/extents.c~hfsplus-fix-return-value-of-hfsplus_get_block fs/hfsplus/extents.c
--- a/fs/hfsplus/extents.c~hfsplus-fix-return-value-of-hfsplus_get_block
+++ a/fs/hfsplus/extents.c
@@ -237,7 +237,9 @@ int hfsplus_get_block(struct inode *inod
 	ablock = iblock >> sbi->fs_shift;
 
 	if (iblock >= hip->fs_blocks) {
-		if (iblock > hip->fs_blocks || !create)
+		if (!create)
+			return 0;
+		if (iblock > hip->fs_blocks)
 			return -EIO;
 		if (ablock >= hip->alloc_blocks) {
 			res = hfsplus_file_extend(inode, false);
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from ernesto.mnd.fernandez@xxxxxxxxx are

hfsplus-prevent-btree-data-loss-on-root-split.patch
hfsplus-fix-bug-on-bnode-parent-update.patch
hfs-prevent-btree-data-loss-on-root-split.patch
hfs-fix-bug-on-bnode-parent-update.patch
hfsplus-prevent-btree-data-loss-on-enospc.patch
hfs-prevent-btree-data-loss-on-enospc.patch
hfsplus-fix-return-value-of-hfsplus_get_block.patch
hfs-fix-return-value-of-hfs_get_block.patch




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux