The patch titled
Subject: checkpatch: add a --strict test for structs with bool member definitions
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
checkpatch-add-a-strict-test-for-structs-with-bool-member-definitions.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: checkpatch: add a --strict test for structs with bool member definitions
A struct with a bool member can have different sizes on various
architectures because neither bool size nor alignment is standardized.
So emit a message on the use of bool in structs only in .h files and not
.c files.
There is the real possibility that this test could have a false positive
when a bool is declared as an automatic, so limit the test to .h files
where the only false positive is for declarations in static inline
functions.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/95477c93db187bab6da8a8ba7c57836868446179.camel@xxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
scripts/checkpatch.pl | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl~checkpatch-add-a-strict-test-for-structs-with-bool-member-definitions
+++ a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -6251,6 +6251,13 @@ sub process {
"Avoid using bool as bitfield. Prefer bool bitfields as unsigned int or u<8|16|32>\n" . $herecurr);
}
+# check for bool use in .h files
+ if ($realfile =~ /\.h$/ &&
+ $sline =~ /^.\s+bool\s*$Ident\s*(?::\s*d+\s*)?;/) {
+ CHK("BOOL_MEMBER",
+ "Avoid using bool structure members because of possible alignment issues - see: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/21/384\n"; . $herecurr);
+ }
+
# check for semaphores initialized locked
if ($line =~ /^.\s*sema_init.+,\W?0\W?\)/) {
WARN("CONSIDER_COMPLETION",
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from joe@xxxxxxxxxxx are
