The patch titled
Subject: memstick: use sector_div instead of do_div
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
memstick-use-sector_div-instead-of-do_div.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: memstick: use sector_div instead of do_div
do_div is the wrong way to divide a sector_t, as it is less efficient when
sector_t is 32-bit wide. With the upcoming do_div optimizations, the
kernel starts warning about this:
drivers/memstick/core/ms_block.c: In function 'msb_io_work':
include/asm-generic/div64.h:207:28: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast
This changes the code to use sector_div instead, which always produces
optimal code.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/memstick/core/ms_block.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN drivers/memstick/core/ms_block.c~memstick-use-sector_div-instead-of-do_div drivers/memstick/core/ms_block.c
--- a/drivers/memstick/core/ms_block.c~memstick-use-sector_div-instead-of-do_div
+++ a/drivers/memstick/core/ms_block.c
@@ -1909,7 +1909,7 @@ static void msb_io_work(struct work_stru
lba = blk_rq_pos(msb->req);
sector_div(lba, msb->page_size / 512);
- page = do_div(lba, msb->pages_in_block);
+ page = sector_div(lba, msb->pages_in_block);
if (rq_data_dir(msb->req) == READ)
error = msb_do_read_request(msb, lba, page, sg,
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from arnd@xxxxxxxx are
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
