The patch titled
Subject: sfc: don't call dma_supported
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
sfc-dont-call-dma_supported.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Subject: sfc: don't call dma_supported
dma_set_mask already checks for a supported DMA mask before updating it,
the call to dma_supported is redundant.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Cc: Solarflare linux maintainers <linux-net-drivers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Shradha Shah <sshah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c | 8 +++-----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff -puN drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c~sfc-dont-call-dma_supported drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c~sfc-dont-call-dma_supported
+++ a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c
@@ -1247,11 +1247,9 @@ static int efx_init_io(struct efx_nic *e
* masks event though they reject 46 bit masks.
*/
while (dma_mask > 0x7fffffffUL) {
- if (dma_supported(&pci_dev->dev, dma_mask)) {
- rc = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pci_dev->dev, dma_mask);
- if (rc == 0)
- break;
- }
+ rc = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pci_dev->dev, dma_mask);
+ if (rc == 0)
+ break;
dma_mask >>= 1;
}
if (rc) {
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from hch@xxxxxx are
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
