The patch titled Subject: kernel/watchdog.c: fix race between proc_watchdog_thresh() and watchdog_timer_fn() has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was watchdog-fix-race-between-proc_watchdog_thresh-and-watchdog_timer_fn.patch This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree ------------------------------------------------------ From: Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: kernel/watchdog.c: fix race between proc_watchdog_thresh() and watchdog_timer_fn() Theoretically it is possible that the watchdog timer expires right at the time when a user sets 'watchdog_thresh' to zero (note: this disables the lockup detectors). In this scenario, the is_softlockup() function - which is called by the timer - could produce a false positive. Fix this by checking the current value of 'watchdog_thresh'. Signed-off-by: Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- kernel/watchdog.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff -puN kernel/watchdog.c~watchdog-fix-race-between-proc_watchdog_thresh-and-watchdog_timer_fn kernel/watchdog.c --- a/kernel/watchdog.c~watchdog-fix-race-between-proc_watchdog_thresh-and-watchdog_timer_fn +++ a/kernel/watchdog.c @@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ static int is_softlockup(unsigned long t { unsigned long now = get_timestamp(); - if (watchdog_enabled & SOFT_WATCHDOG_ENABLED) { + if ((watchdog_enabled & SOFT_WATCHDOG_ENABLED) && watchdog_thresh){ /* Warn about unreasonable delays. */ if (time_after(now, touch_ts + get_softlockup_thresh())) return now - touch_ts; _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from uobergfe@xxxxxxxxxx are -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html