The patch titled
Subject: bfs: correct return values
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
bfs-correct-return-values.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Sanidhya Kashyap <sanidhya.gatech@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: bfs: correct return values
In case of failed memory allocation, the return should be ENOMEM instead
of ENOSPC.
Return -EIO when sb_bread() fails.
Signed-off-by: Sanidhya Kashyap <sanidhya.gatech@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tigran Aivazian <tigran@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/bfs/dir.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff -puN fs/bfs/dir.c~bfs-correct-return-values fs/bfs/dir.c
--- a/fs/bfs/dir.c~bfs-correct-return-values
+++ a/fs/bfs/dir.c
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ static int bfs_create(struct inode *dir,
inode = new_inode(s);
if (!inode)
- return -ENOSPC;
+ return -ENOMEM;
mutex_lock(&info->bfs_lock);
ino = find_first_zero_bit(info->si_imap, info->si_lasti + 1);
if (ino > info->si_lasti) {
@@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ static int bfs_add_entry(struct inode *d
for (block = sblock; block <= eblock; block++) {
bh = sb_bread(dir->i_sb, block);
if (!bh)
- return -ENOSPC;
+ return -EIO;
for (off = 0; off < BFS_BSIZE; off += BFS_DIRENT_SIZE) {
de = (struct bfs_dirent *)(bh->b_data + off);
if (!de->ino) {
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from sanidhya.gatech@xxxxxxxxx are
origin.patch
ocfs2-trusted-xattr-missing-cap_sys_admin-check.patch
linux-next.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
