The patch titled
Subject: bfs: bfad_worker cleanup
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
bfs-bfad_worker-cleanup.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx>
Subject: bfs: bfad_worker cleanup
This kthread is not loop at all due to break at the end of the loop. Make
that function linear, with no while loop.
And remove an unnecessary cast.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Anil Gurumurthy <anil.gurumurthy@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/scsi/bfa/bfad.c | 22 +++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff -puN drivers/scsi/bfa/bfad.c~bfs-bfad_worker-cleanup drivers/scsi/bfa/bfad.c
--- a/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfad.c~bfs-bfad_worker-cleanup
+++ a/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfad.c
@@ -1079,22 +1079,18 @@ bfad_start_ops(struct bfad_s *bfad) {
int
bfad_worker(void *ptr)
{
- struct bfad_s *bfad;
- unsigned long flags;
+ struct bfad_s *bfad = ptr;
+ unsigned long flags;
- bfad = (struct bfad_s *)ptr;
+ if (kthread_should_stop())
+ return 0;
- while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
+ /* Send event BFAD_E_INIT_SUCCESS */
+ bfa_sm_send_event(bfad, BFAD_E_INIT_SUCCESS);
- /* Send event BFAD_E_INIT_SUCCESS */
- bfa_sm_send_event(bfad, BFAD_E_INIT_SUCCESS);
-
- spin_lock_irqsave(&bfad->bfad_lock, flags);
- bfad->bfad_tsk = NULL;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bfad->bfad_lock, flags);
-
- break;
- }
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&bfad->bfad_lock, flags);
+ bfad->bfad_tsk = NULL;
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bfad->bfad_lock, flags);
return 0;
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from jslaby@xxxxxxx are
origin.patch
linux-next.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
