The patch titled Subject: memcg: simplify unreclaimable groups handling in soft limit reclaim has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was memcg-simplify-unreclaimable-groups-handling-in-soft-limit-reclaim.patch This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree ------------------------------------------------------ From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: memcg: simplify unreclaimable groups handling in soft limit reclaim If we fail to reclaim anything from a cgroup during a soft reclaim pass we want to get the next largest cgroup exceeding its soft limit. To achieve this, we should obviously remove the current group from the tree and then pick the largest group. Currently we have a weird loop instead. Let's simplify it. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- mm/memcontrol.c | 26 ++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff -puN mm/memcontrol.c~memcg-simplify-unreclaimable-groups-handling-in-soft-limit-reclaim mm/memcontrol.c --- a/mm/memcontrol.c~memcg-simplify-unreclaimable-groups-handling-in-soft-limit-reclaim +++ a/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -3518,34 +3518,16 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_soft_limit_recl nr_reclaimed += reclaimed; *total_scanned += nr_scanned; spin_lock_irq(&mctz->lock); + __mem_cgroup_remove_exceeded(mz, mctz); /* * If we failed to reclaim anything from this memory cgroup * it is time to move on to the next cgroup */ next_mz = NULL; - if (!reclaimed) { - do { - /* - * Loop until we find yet another one. - * - * By the time we get the soft_limit lock - * again, someone might have aded the - * group back on the RB tree. Iterate to - * make sure we get a different mem. - * mem_cgroup_largest_soft_limit_node returns - * NULL if no other cgroup is present on - * the tree - */ - next_mz = - __mem_cgroup_largest_soft_limit_node(mctz); - if (next_mz == mz) - css_put(&next_mz->memcg->css); - else /* next_mz == NULL or other memcg */ - break; - } while (1); - } - __mem_cgroup_remove_exceeded(mz, mctz); + if (!reclaimed) + next_mz = __mem_cgroup_largest_soft_limit_node(mctz); + excess = soft_limit_excess(mz->memcg); /* * One school of thought says that we should not add _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from vdavydov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx are origin.patch memcg-__mem_cgroup_free-remove-stale-disarm_static_keys-comment.patch memcg-dont-check-mm-in-__memcg_kmem_get_cachenewpage_charge.patch memcg-do-not-abuse-memcg_kmem_skip_account.patch memcg-zap-kmem_account_flags.patch memcg-only-check-memcg_kmem_skip_account-in-__memcg_kmem_get_cache.patch memcg-turn-memcg_kmem_skip_account-into-a-bit-field.patch mm-vmscan-invoke-slab-shrinkers-from-shrink_zone.patch mm-vmscan-invoke-slab-shrinkers-from-shrink_zone-fix.patch memcg-fix-possible-use-after-free-in-memcg_kmem_get_cache.patch linux-next.patch slab-fix-cpuset-check-in-fallback_alloc.patch slub-fix-cpuset-check-in-get_any_partial.patch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html