+ res_counter-remove-interface-for-locked-charging-and-uncharging.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Subject: + res_counter-remove-interface-for-locked-charging-and-uncharging.patch added to -mm tree
To: rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx,cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,cl@xxxxxxxxx,hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx,kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,mgorman@xxxxxxx,mhocko@xxxxxxx,oleg@xxxxxxxxxx,penberg@xxxxxxxxxx,riel@xxxxxxxxxx,thockin@xxxxxxxxxx,tj@xxxxxxxxxx,wujianguo@xxxxxxxxxx
From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 13:21:39 -0800


The patch titled
     Subject: res_counter: remove interface for locked charging and uncharging
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     res_counter-remove-interface-for-locked-charging-and-uncharging.patch

This patch should soon appear at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/res_counter-remove-interface-for-locked-charging-and-uncharging.patch
and later at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/res_counter-remove-interface-for-locked-charging-and-uncharging.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: res_counter: remove interface for locked charging and uncharging

The res_counter_{charge,uncharge}_locked() variants are not used in the
kernel outside of the resource counter code itself, so remove the
interface.

Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tim Hockin <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 Documentation/cgroups/resource_counter.txt |   12 +--------
 include/linux/res_counter.h                |    6 ----
 kernel/res_counter.c                       |   23 +++++++++----------
 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff -puN Documentation/cgroups/resource_counter.txt~res_counter-remove-interface-for-locked-charging-and-uncharging Documentation/cgroups/resource_counter.txt
--- a/Documentation/cgroups/resource_counter.txt~res_counter-remove-interface-for-locked-charging-and-uncharging
+++ a/Documentation/cgroups/resource_counter.txt
@@ -76,15 +76,7 @@ to work with it.
 	limit_fail_at parameter is set to the particular res_counter element
 	where the charging failed.
 
- d. int res_counter_charge_locked
-			(struct res_counter *rc, unsigned long val, bool force)
-
-	The same as res_counter_charge(), but it must not acquire/release the
-	res_counter->lock internally (it must be called with res_counter->lock
-	held). The force parameter indicates whether we can bypass the limit.
-
- e. u64 res_counter_uncharge[_locked]
-			(struct res_counter *rc, unsigned long val)
+ d. u64 res_counter_uncharge(struct res_counter *rc, unsigned long val)
 
 	When a resource is released (freed) it should be de-accounted
 	from the resource counter it was accounted to.  This is called
@@ -93,7 +85,7 @@ to work with it.
 
 	The _locked routines imply that the res_counter->lock is taken.
 
- f. u64 res_counter_uncharge_until
+ e. u64 res_counter_uncharge_until
 		(struct res_counter *rc, struct res_counter *top,
 		 unsigned long val)
 
diff -puN include/linux/res_counter.h~res_counter-remove-interface-for-locked-charging-and-uncharging include/linux/res_counter.h
--- a/include/linux/res_counter.h~res_counter-remove-interface-for-locked-charging-and-uncharging
+++ a/include/linux/res_counter.h
@@ -104,15 +104,13 @@ void res_counter_init(struct res_counter
  *       units, e.g. numbers, bytes, Kbytes, etc
  *
  * returns 0 on success and <0 if the counter->usage will exceed the
- * counter->limit _locked call expects the counter->lock to be taken
+ * counter->limit
  *
  * charge_nofail works the same, except that it charges the resource
  * counter unconditionally, and returns < 0 if the after the current
  * charge we are over limit.
  */
 
-int __must_check res_counter_charge_locked(struct res_counter *counter,
-					   unsigned long val, bool force);
 int __must_check res_counter_charge(struct res_counter *counter,
 		unsigned long val, struct res_counter **limit_fail_at);
 int res_counter_charge_nofail(struct res_counter *counter,
@@ -125,12 +123,10 @@ int res_counter_charge_nofail(struct res
  * @val: the amount of the resource
  *
  * these calls check for usage underflow and show a warning on the console
- * _locked call expects the counter->lock to be taken
  *
  * returns the total charges still present in @counter.
  */
 
-u64 res_counter_uncharge_locked(struct res_counter *counter, unsigned long val);
 u64 res_counter_uncharge(struct res_counter *counter, unsigned long val);
 
 u64 res_counter_uncharge_until(struct res_counter *counter,
diff -puN kernel/res_counter.c~res_counter-remove-interface-for-locked-charging-and-uncharging kernel/res_counter.c
--- a/kernel/res_counter.c~res_counter-remove-interface-for-locked-charging-and-uncharging
+++ a/kernel/res_counter.c
@@ -22,8 +22,18 @@ void res_counter_init(struct res_counter
 	counter->parent = parent;
 }
 
-int res_counter_charge_locked(struct res_counter *counter, unsigned long val,
-			      bool force)
+static u64 res_counter_uncharge_locked(struct res_counter *counter,
+				       unsigned long val)
+{
+	if (WARN_ON(counter->usage < val))
+		val = counter->usage;
+
+	counter->usage -= val;
+	return counter->usage;
+}
+
+static int res_counter_charge_locked(struct res_counter *counter,
+				     unsigned long val, bool force)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
 
@@ -86,15 +96,6 @@ int res_counter_charge_nofail(struct res
 	return __res_counter_charge(counter, val, limit_fail_at, true);
 }
 
-u64 res_counter_uncharge_locked(struct res_counter *counter, unsigned long val)
-{
-	if (WARN_ON(counter->usage < val))
-		val = counter->usage;
-
-	counter->usage -= val;
-	return counter->usage;
-}
-
 u64 res_counter_uncharge_until(struct res_counter *counter,
 			       struct res_counter *top,
 			       unsigned long val)
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx are

mm-close-pagetail-race.patch
mm-page_alloc-make-first_page-visible-before-pagetail.patch
kthread-ensure-locality-of-task_struct-allocations.patch
arch-x86-mm-kmemcheck-kmemcheckc-use-kstrtoint-instead-of-sscanf.patch
mm-slab-slub-use-page-list-consistently-instead-of-page-lru.patch
mm-compaction-ignore-pageblock-skip-when-manually-invoking-compaction.patch
mm-vmscan-shrink_slab-rename-max_pass-freeable.patch
mm-hugetlb-mark-some-bootstrap-functions-as-__init.patch
mm-compaction-avoid-isolating-pinned-pages.patch
mm-compactionc-mark-function-as-static.patch
mm-memoryc-mark-functions-as-static.patch
mm-mmapc-mark-function-as-static.patch
mm-process_vm_accessc-mark-function-as-static.patch
mm-process_vm_accessc-mark-function-as-static-fix.patch
mm-page_cgroupc-mark-functions-as-static.patch
mm-nobootmemc-mark-function-as-static.patch
include-linux-mmh-remove-ifdef-condition.patch
mm-readaheadc-fix-readahead-failure-for-memoryless-numa-nodes-and-limit-readahead-pages.patch
mmnuma-reorganize-change_pmd_range.patch
mmnuma-reorganize-change_pmd_range-fix.patch
move-mmu-notifier-call-from-change_protection-to-change_pmd_range.patch
mm-exclude-memory-less-nodes-from-zone_reclaim.patch
memcg-slab-never-try-to-merge-memcg-caches.patch
memcg-slab-cleanup-memcg-cache-creation.patch
memcg-slab-separate-memcg-vs-root-cache-creation-paths.patch
memcg-slab-unregister-cache-from-memcg-before-starting-to-destroy-it.patch
memcg-slab-do-not-destroy-children-caches-if-parent-has-aliases.patch
slub-adjust-memcg-caches-when-creating-cache-alias.patch
slub-rework-sysfs-layout-for-memcg-caches.patch
mm-revert-thp-make-madv_hugepage-check-for-mm-def_flags.patch
mm-revert-thp-make-madv_hugepage-check-for-mm-def_flags-ignore-madv_hugepage-on-s390-to-prevent-sigsegv-in-qemu.patch
mm-thp-add-vm_init_def_mask-and-prctl_thp_disable.patch
exec-kill-the-unnecessary-mm-def_flags-setting-in-load_elf_binary.patch
fork-collapse-copy_flags-into-copy_process.patch
mm-mempolicy-rename-slab_node-for-clarity.patch
mm-mempolicy-remove-per-process-flag.patch
res_counter-remove-interface-for-locked-charging-and-uncharging.patch
kernel-resourcec-make-reallocate_resource-static.patch
mm-utilc-add-kstrimdup.patch
fault-injection-set-bounds-on-what-proc-self-make-it-fail-accepts.patch
fault-injection-set-bounds-on-what-proc-self-make-it-fail-accepts-fix.patch
linux-next.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux