Hi Paul, On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 at 04:05, Paul Burton <paul.burton@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Firoz, > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 11:44:20AM +0530, Firoz Khan wrote: > > diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/Makefile b/arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/Makefile > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000..dc6bbb1 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/Makefile > > @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@ > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > +kapi := arch/$(SRCARCH)/include/generated/asm > > +uapi := arch/$(SRCARCH)/include/generated/uapi/asm > > + > > +_dummy := $(shell [ -d '$(uapi)' ] || mkdir -p '$(uapi)') \ > > + $(shell [ -d '$(kapi)' ] || mkdir -p '$(kapi)') > > + > > +syscallo32 := $(srctree)/$(src)/syscall_o32.tbl > > +syscall64 := $(srctree)/$(src)/syscall_64.tbl > > +syscalln32 := $(srctree)/$(src)/syscall_n32.tbl > > +syshdr := $(srctree)/$(src)/syscallhdr.sh > > +systbl := $(srctree)/$(src)/syscalltbl.sh > > Could we go with 'n64' instead of just '64'? > > When we get nanoMIPS support we'll be introducing the p32 ABI, and > there's a reasonable chance that the equivalent p64 ABI may come along > in the future. Using 'n64' now would avoid confusion in that case where > we may have 2 different 64-bit ABIs. Sure, will do. Thanks Firoz > > Thanks, > Paul
