Hi Ravi, On 08/06, Ravi Bangoria wrote: > > >> +static int delayed_uprobe_add(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct mm_struct *mm) > >> +{ > >> + struct delayed_uprobe *du; > >> + > >> + if (delayed_uprobe_check(uprobe, mm)) > >> + return 0; > >> + > >> + du = kzalloc(sizeof(*du), GFP_KERNEL); > >> + if (!du) > >> + return -ENOMEM; > >> + > >> + du->uprobe = uprobe; > >> + du->mm = mm; > > > > I am surprised I didn't notice this before... > > > > So > > du->mm = mm; > > > > is fine, mm can't go away, uprobe_clear_state() does delayed_uprobe_remove(NULL,mm). > > > > But > > du->uprobe = uprobe; > > > > doesn't look right, uprobe can go away and it can be freed, its memory can be reused. > > We can't rely on remove_breakpoint(), > > > I'm sorry. I didn't get this. How can uprobe go away without calling > uprobe_unregister() > -> rergister_for_each_vma() > -> remove_breakpoint() > And remove_breakpoint() will get called assuming that _unregister() will find the same vma with the probed insn. But as I said, the application can munmap the probed page/vma. No? > > Also. delayed_uprobe_add() should check the list and avoid duplicates. Otherwise the > > trivial > > > > for (;;) > > munmap(mmap(uprobed_file)); > > > > will eat the memory until uprobe is unregistered. > > > I'm already calling delayed_uprobe_check(uprobe, mm) from delayed_uprobe_add(). Oops ;) Oleg.