On Tue, 2018-07-31 at 15:47 +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > Hi, > > Because the designware IP was not able to handle the SDA hold time > before > version 1.11a, MSCC has its own implementation. Add support for it and > then add > i2c on ocelot boards. > > I would expect patches 1 to 4 to go through the i2c tree and 5-6 > through > the mips tree once patch 4 has been reviewed by the DT maintainers. > Thanks for an update, looks quite nice! I gave my tags wherever it is appropriate. > Changes in v2: > - removed first patch as a similar one is in i2c-next > - rebase on top of i2c-next It seems you also took my patches which are not yet in i2c/for-next. > - Added two patches to implement ideas from Andy > > Alexandre Belloni (6): > i2c: designware: use generic table matching > i2c: designware: move #ifdef CONFIG_OF to the top > i2c: designware: allow IP specific sda_hold_time > i2c: designware: add MSCC Ocelot support > mips: dts: mscc: Add i2c on ocelot > mips: dts: mscc: enable i2c on ocelot_pcb123 > > .../bindings/i2c/i2c-designware.txt | 9 ++- > arch/mips/boot/dts/mscc/ocelot.dtsi | 18 ++++++ > arch/mips/boot/dts/mscc/ocelot_pcb123.dts | 6 ++ > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-common.c | 2 + > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h | 4 ++ > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c | 62 +++++++++++++++--- > - > 6 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Intel Finland Oy
