Re: [PATCH V2 00/25] MIPS: ath79: convert target to pure OF

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi John,

On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 01:58:17PM +0200, John Crispin wrote:
> In the last couple of months we have been conevrting this target to OF
> inside OpenWrt. This series is an aggragte of all the patches that have
> been produced in that period. There have been plenty of dts contributions
> already and we hope to be able to drop the old mach file based target in
> the not too distant future.
> 
> Felix Fietkau (9):
>   MIPS: ath79: fix register address in ath79_ddr_wb_flush()
>   MIPS: ath79: fix system restart
>   MIPS: ath79: finetune cpu-overrides
>   MIPS: ath79: add helpers for setting clocks and expose the ref clock
>   MIPS: ath79: move legacy "wdt" and "uart" clock aliases out of soc
>     init
>   MIPS: ath79: pass PLL base to clock init functions
>   MIPS: ath79: make specifying the reference clock in DT optional
>   MIPS: ath79: support setting up clock via DT on all SoC types
>   MIPS: ath79: export switch MDIO reference clock
> 
> Gabor Juhos (2):
>   MIPS: ath79: add lots of missing registers
>   MIPS: ath79: enable uart during early_prink
> 
> John Crispin (12):
>   MIPS: ath79: select the PINCTRL subsystem
>   dt-bindings: PCI: qcom,ar7100: adds binding doc
>   MIPS: pci-ar71xx: convert to OF
>   dt-bindings: PCI: qcom,ar7240: adds binding doc
>   MIPS: pci-ar724x: convert to OF
>   MIPS: ath79: drop legacy IRQ code
>   MIPS: ath79: drop machfiles
>   MIPS: ath79: drop legacy pci code
>   MIPS: ath79: drop platform device registration code
>   MIPS: ath79: drop !OF clock code
>   MIPS: ath79: sanitize symbols
>   spi: ath79: drop pdata support
> 
> Mathias Kresin (1):
>   MIPS: ath79: get PCIe controller out of reset
> 
> Matthias Schiffer (1):
>   MIPS: ath79: add support for QCA953x QCA956x TP9343

Patch 4 is in for v4.18-rc7.

I've applied patches 1-3,5-8 to mips-next for 4.19 (with a couple of
tweaks to patch 7 addressing Sergei's comments).

Patches 9-25 need DT binding review.

One general question I have: where is the DT for these systems being
maintained? It doesn't appear to be in-tree - could it be? Because I
don't see the DT source it's difficult to see what impact the remaining
changes will have - for example would they break backwards compatibility
with any systems?

Thanks,
    Paul




[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux