Alexandre, Linux On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:53 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Philippe Ombredanne > <pombredanne@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR MIT) >>> >>> Wow never saw that before. OK I guess. >> >> That's the new thing. Less legalese boilerplate, and more code for the >> better IMHO. >> >> You can check the doc patches from Thomas for details [1] >> >> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/4/934 > > Yeah I'm aware of this part, but I didn't see that combined license > before. > > What is the reason for not just using GPL 2 here? Linus, That'a a question for Alexandre that submitted this patch in the first place, not me. Alexandre? -- Cordially Philippe Ombredanne
