On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR MIT) >> >> Wow never saw that before. OK I guess. > > That's the new thing. Less legalese boilerplate, and more code for the > better IMHO. > > You can check the doc patches from Thomas for details [1] > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/4/934 Yeah I'm aware of this part, but I didn't see that combined license before. What is the reason for not just using GPL 2 here? Yours, Linus Walleij
