On Mon, 3 Jul 2017, James Hogan wrote: > > Submitted third in the series so that the presence of "mips16e2" in > > /proc/cpuinfo not only indicates the hardware feature, but our correct > > unaligned emulation as well. > > This should be mentioned in the commit description (not the 3rd in the > series bit, the "it indicates both the hw feature and unaligned > emulation" bit). Shall I repost the series with this piece amended? Or will just 3/4 do? Maciej
