On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 01:39:23PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Submitted third in the series so that the presence of "mips16e2" in > /proc/cpuinfo not only indicates the hardware feature, but our correct > unaligned emulation as well. This should be mentioned in the commit description (not the 3rd in the series bit, the "it indicates both the hw feature and unaligned emulation" bit). Otherwise Reivewed-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx> Cheers James > > There's a `checkpatch.pl' error reported for the unusual formatting, > however it is consistent with surrounding code and I do not think we > want to make this statement an oddball. > > Maciej > > linux-mips16e2-ase-report.diff > Index: linux-sfr-test/arch/mips/kernel/proc.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-sfr-test.orig/arch/mips/kernel/proc.c 2017-05-22 22:42:16.000000000 +0100 > +++ linux-sfr-test/arch/mips/kernel/proc.c 2017-05-22 22:56:31.000000000 +0100 > @@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file > > seq_printf(m, "ASEs implemented\t:"); > if (cpu_has_mips16) seq_printf(m, "%s", " mips16"); > + if (cpu_has_mips16e2) seq_printf(m, "%s", " mips16e2"); > if (cpu_has_mdmx) seq_printf(m, "%s", " mdmx"); > if (cpu_has_mips3d) seq_printf(m, "%s", " mips3d"); > if (cpu_has_smartmips) seq_printf(m, "%s", " smartmips");
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
