On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 19:39:31 +0200 Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2016-04-21 19:18+0200, Greg Kurz: > > On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:08:41 +0200 > > Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> 2016-04-21 17:49+0200, Greg Kurz: > >> > So we're good ? > >> > >> I support the change, just had a nit about API design for v2. > >> > > > > As I said in my other mail, I'm not sure we should do more... if > > that's okay for you and you still support the change, maybe you > > can give an Acked-by ? > > I'm evil when it comes to APIs, so bear it a bit longer. :) > Fair enough :) > >> > Whose tree can carry these patches ? > >> > >> (PowerPC is the only immediately affected arch, so I'd it there.) > >> > >> What do you think is best? My experience in this regard is pretty low. > >> > > > > Maybe Paolo's tree but I guess we'd need some more acks from x86, ARM and > > PowerPC :) KVM maintainers... > > Ok. >
