2016-04-21 19:18+0200, Greg Kurz: > On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:08:41 +0200 > Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> 2016-04-21 17:49+0200, Greg Kurz: >> > So we're good ? >> >> I support the change, just had a nit about API design for v2. >> > > As I said in my other mail, I'm not sure we should do more... if > that's okay for you and you still support the change, maybe you > can give an Acked-by ? I'm evil when it comes to APIs, so bear it a bit longer. :) >> > Whose tree can carry these patches ? >> >> (PowerPC is the only immediately affected arch, so I'd it there.) >> >> What do you think is best? My experience in this regard is pretty low. >> > > Maybe Paolo's tree but I guess we'd need some more acks from x86, ARM and > PowerPC :) KVM maintainers... Ok.
