Le 23/10/2015 21:51, Jaedon Shin a écrit : > On Oct 23, 2015, at 1:51 PM, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> 2015-10-22 20:58 GMT-07:00 Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>: >>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 10:44:13AM +0900, Jaedon Shin wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> This patch series adds support SATA for BMIPS_GENERIC. >>>> >>>> Ralf, >>>> I request you to drop already submitted patches for NAND device nodes. >>>> It is merge conflicts with this patches. >>>> http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/10577/ >>>> http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/10578/ >>>> http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/10579/ >>>> http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/10580/ >>>> >>>> Jaedon Shin (10): >>>> ata: ahci_brcmstb: make the driver buildable on BMIPS_GENERIC >>>> ata: ahch_brcmstb: add data for port offset >>>> ata: ahci_brcmstb: add support 40nm platforms >>> >>> ata part looks fine to me. Let me know when the other parts get in. >>> I'll apply the ata ones to libata/for-4.4. >> >> There are a few comments coming on the ATA and Device Tree part, and I >> also would like Brian Norris (who submitted the patches) to take a >> look at these. But overall, this looks great. >> >> I think we have a bit too many compatible strings defined, I need to >> lookup tomorrow when I am back in the office which BCM7xxx started >> featuring a SATA3 AHCI compliant core, it might be 7420, but I am not >> sure >> > > I agree with you. If you have good opinion, I want you to tell me. Based on Kevin's feedback, we should be using 7425 as the compatible string for these AHCI controllers. Thanks! -- Florian
