On Sat, 20 Jun 2015 12:51:37 +0200 Alban <albeu@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 10:42:13 +0300 > Antony Pavlov <antonynpavlov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 23:58:11 +0200 > > Alban <albeu@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 8 Jun 2015 13:17:58 +0300 > > > Antony Pavlov <antonynpavlov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > IMHO AR9132 SoC can't work without external oscilator. > > > > > > > > Can we just move basic extosc declaration to SoC dt file > > > > (ar9132.dtsi)? So board dt file ar9132_tl_wr1043nd_v1.dts will > > > > contain only oscilator clock frequency value. > > > > > > I would prefer to keep the split between the files in sync with the > > > hardware. I understand that most simple board designs use a fixed > > > oscillator, but that might not always be the case. > > > > > > > The AR9132 SoC __always__ use one external oscilator. > > Yes, but what I don't like is to impose the clock source being a > fixed-oscillator. What if the board use a clock from another > component that need to be represented in the DT as something else > than a fixed-oscillator? The absolute majority of the ar9132-based boards has fixed-oscillator (Actually I suppose all of them has fixed oscillator). If some board has different clock source then we can completely alter extosc node in the board dts file. (But I have some doubts in existence of such board.) -- Best regards, Antony Pavlov
