On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Some MIPS CPUs have an aggressive speculative load and may erroneuosly load > some cache line in the middle of DMA transaction. CPU discards result but cache > doesn't. If DMA happens from device then additional cache invalidation is needed > on that CPU's after DMA. > > Found in test. > > Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/mips/mm/dma-default.c | 10 ++++++---- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/mips/mm/dma-default.c b/arch/mips/mm/dma-default.c > index 609d1241b0c4..ccf49ecfbf8c 100644 > --- a/arch/mips/mm/dma-default.c > +++ b/arch/mips/mm/dma-default.c > @@ -67,11 +67,13 @@ static inline struct page *dma_addr_to_page(struct device *dev, > * systems and only the R10000 and R12000 are used in such systems, the > * SGI IP28 Indigo² rsp. SGI IP32 aka O2. > */ > -static inline int cpu_needs_post_dma_flush(struct device *dev) > +static inline int cpu_needs_post_dma_flush(struct device *dev, > + enum dma_data_direction direction) > { > return !plat_device_is_coherent(dev) && > (boot_cpu_type() == CPU_R10000 || > boot_cpu_type() == CPU_R12000 || > + (cpu_has_maar && (direction != DMA_TO_DEVICE)) || > boot_cpu_type() == CPU_BMIPS5000); Can all of these CPUs safely skip the post_dma_flush on DMA_TO_DEVICE (not just maar)?